Anveṣaṇam @vicayana: A Retarded Hindu Sepoy on the Internet

 

 Anveṣaṇam @vicayana: A Retarded Hindu Sepoy on the Internet

 Shrikant G. Talageri

 

[I put up the article originally with the phrase "mentally retarded". On consideration, I am removing the word "mentally" as too crude]

I have basically finished with writing articles: my article "The Three Grades of Anti-Hinduism" posted on 6 May 2023 was intended to be my last article, and it was only the familiar but life-and-death plight of Manipuri Hindus which impelled me to write another article "Operation 'Exterminate-the-Meitei-in-Manipur'"  on 1 June 2023. Any possible further articles will be only about Music or Konkani, and articles on any other topic will only be written if I have to deal with critics of my work on Rigvedic Historical Analysis. This is one such article, dealing with a completely retarded Hindu sepoy on the internet (specifically twitter), typically having a puffed up Sanskrit handle name, Anveṣaṇam @vicayana.

Here is the tweet:

 

This seems to be in reply to another tweet by someone else:

 

Like all educated illiterates on twitter, this retarded person, writing on topics on which his knowledge is zero and free in his use of abusive epithets like "retard", only succeeds in demonstrating why illiterate critics of my Rigvedic analysis are in fact genuinely retarded and can never be taken seriously.

The tweet that he quotes does not mention III.17.4 as a verse containing the word ara ("spoke"), so what exactly is the basis for his assertion that this verse from the Old book 3 refers to spokes?

His basis is the usual source of retarded Hindu sepoys on the internet: the works of present-day western Indologists (to be distinguished from the genuine, if misguided, Indologists of the past) working to the agenda of proving that the Rigveda represents a text by "Aryan invaders/immigrants". He quotes the translation of III.17.4 by Stephanie Jamison:

 

 

 

Like all educated illiterate sepoys on the internet, this retarded tweeter with a Sanskrit name demonstrates his illiteracy beyond dispute: Jamison's blatantly wrong translation of the word arati as "spoke" has already been dealt with in detail by me in a previous article "An Incredibly Blatant Mistranslation in Jamison's translation of the Rigveda" on 22 May 2022, which, of course, this illiterate has not read:

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2022/05/an-incredibly-blatant-mistranslation-in.html

All this certainly demonstrates why the critics of my Rigvedic analysis on the internet are illiterate, and nothing more or less than retarded sepoys of the western academic cabal, and therefore should never be taken seriously.