Friday, 24 October 2025

Libelous Character Assassination of Sadhvi Pragya by AI app “Grok” on Twitter

 


Libelous Character Assassination of Sadhvi Pragya by AI app “Grok” on Twitter (X)

Shrikant G. Talageri

  

This is truly unbelievable! I have been writing some articles on the disinformation being spread by the Twitter (X) AI app “Grok”. But in all those cases, the app had an escape route: it could claim (or apologists could claim on its behalf ) that it had been fed wrong information. But the following tweet today is not just mere misinformation, it is downright libelous and scandalous character assassination!

The following tweet was put up by someone on Twitter (X) , a video of one of those “Radhe Guru Ma” type of “godmen/godwomen” and their “bhakts”, who make every true Hindu hang his/her head in shame. The fact about Hinduism is, of course, as I pointed out in my article “Hindutva or Hindu Nationalism”: “The range of Indian religion, both in respect of philosophy and doctrines, as well as customs and rituals, is quite a complete one: every shade of thought and idea (theistic, atheistic and agnostic), from the most materialistic to the most spiritual, from the most rationalistic to the most irrational, from the most humane to the most barbaric, and from the most puritanical or orthodox to the most profane or heterodox, has been explored by the different schools of philosophy, different sects and different individual writers; and every kind and level of ritual and custom from the most primitive to the most sophisticated, from the simplest to the most elaborate,  and from the most humane to the most ruthless, is found in one or the other part of India.” So Hinduism can also contain all kinds of dirt as found in other religions, along with the purest spiritual and philosophical strands found nowhere else. “Godmen/godwomen” of this kind are an example of such dirt, and no-one should feel Hinduism in any way stands indicted by their existence. But they exist.

The tweet, against which I have no complaint whatsoever, was as follows:

https://x.com/adityacasm_

https://x.com/adityacasm_/status/1981615262253383710

Religion is the best business in India.

12:24 PM · Oct 24, 2025

The tweet has a video, see it for yourself.

 

What is scandalous, libelous and calls for some kind of stern and drastic action is the following stream of comments where another tweeter asks “Grok” to identify the “godwoman”, and “Grok’ falsely, malignantly, scandalously and libelously goes on to identify the female as Sadhvi Pragya!:

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva/status/1981703433301463449

@grok who’s this woman?

6:14 PM · Oct 24, 2025

 

https://x.com/grok

https://x.com/grok/status/1981703716161134635

Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur is the woman featured. She serves as a former BJP MP and vocal Hindu activist known for controversial statements on faith and nationalism. The video illustrates the post's claim by juxtaposing spiritual roles with apparent luxury, highlighting tensions between genuine devotion and commercialized religion in India.

6:15 PM · Oct 24, 2025

 

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva/status/1981704202708824454

@grok don’t give false info

6:17 PM · Oct 24, 2025

 

https://x.com/grok

https://x.com/grok/status/1981704413556388068

What specifically is false? Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur matches the visual and contextual description as a BJP politician and sadhvi often critiqued for blending faith with politics. If you have evidence it's someone else, share it—I'm here to clarify based on facts, not bias. The video still highlights valid debates on religion's commercialization in India.

6:18 PM · Oct 24, 2025

 

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva

https://x.com/PrabuddhaShiva/status/1981704854209957935

She's not Pragya Singh Thakur for sure.

6:20 PM · Oct 24, 2025

 

Although I have been criticizing “Grok” in many articles, even I find this level of brazenness and kind of character assassination mind-boggling: “What specifically is false?... If you have evidence it's someone else, share it—I'm here to clarify based on facts, not bias.” Obviously, the questioner innocently posed the question to “Grok” to get an answer since he did not know the identity of the female.  

I also have no idea whatsoever who that female is, and I couldn’t care less. But this outright and insolent character assassination of a woman, and (in my opinion) one of the most revered women in Hindu circles today, should not go unnoted, unanswered or unpunished (in some way).      


Where was Zarathushtra Born?

 

Where was Zarathushtra Born?

 Shrikant G. Talageri 

 

Someone sent me the following tweet someone has put up today:

https://x.com/alphafirdous

https://x.com/alphafirdous/status/1981562360335847749

According to Shrikant G Talageri, Zoroaster (the founder of Zoroastrianism) was born in kashmir. Shrikant's views are controversial, he is known for promoting "Out of India theory", according to scholars his methodology or conclusions have "fatal errors".

8:54 AM · Oct 24 2025

 

Where do these people get their information from?

To deal first with the secondary comment, “according to scholars his methodology or conclusions have "fatal errors"”: whichscholars” have claimed my “methodology or conclusions have "fatal errors"”, and what exactly are those errors? Cheap unsubstantiated statements of this kind are tantamount to the anonymous letters which most writers (e.g. Enid Blyton, Agatha Christie, etc.) refer to as a kind of criminal activity practiced by the lowest and most cowardly minds. Pathetic is a mild word for this.

But the main point which prompted me to write this rebuttal is the false claim that I have said that “Zoroaster (the founder of Zoroastrianism) was born in kashmir”. Really? Where and when, i.e. in which book or article of mine have I ever made such a claim?

In all my descriptions of the Iranian migrations from India, I have pointed out, for example, and right from my second book in the year 2000, in a detailed section titled "The Iranian Migrations (TALAGERI 2000:208-231):

The evidence of the Rigveda and the Avesta makes it clear that the Iranians, in the earliest period, were restricted to a small area in the east, and the vast area which they occupied in later historical times was the result of a series of migrations and expansions.

The early migrations of the Iranians follow a clear trail: from Kashmir to the Punjab; from the Punjab to southern and eastern Afghanistan; from southern and eastern Afghanistan to the whole of Afghanistan and southern Central Asia; and finally, in later times, over a vast area spread out at least as far west as western Iran and as far north as northern Central Asia and the northern Caucasus.

The early history of the Iranians may be divided into the following periods (see chart on next page).

The details may be examined under the following heads:

A. The Pre-Rigvedic Period.

B. The Early Period of the Rigveda.

C. The Middle period of the Rigveda.

D. The Late Period of the Rigveda.

 

Period

Rigveda

Avesta

Iranian Geographical Area

 

Pre-Rigvedic Period

_________

Kashmir

Early Period of the Rigveda

Early Period of the Rigveda

Pre-Avestan Period

Punjab

Middle Period of the Rigveda

Middle Period of the Rigveda

Period of Gāthā and early Yašts

Punjab, Southern and Eastern Afghanistan

Late Period of the Rigveda

Late Period of the Rigveda

Proper Avestan Period

Punjab, Afghanistan, southern Central Asia

In the pre-Rigvedic period, the Iranians were inhabitants of Kashmir. In the Avesta, this period is remembered as a remote period of prehistory, enshrined in the myth of Airyana VaEjah, the land of severe winters.

 

So it was the remote ancestors of Zarathushtra who lived in Kashmir. My claiming that “Zoroaster (the founder of Zoroastrianism) was born in kashmir” would be tantamount to a supporter of the AIT claiming that “Divodāsa and Sudās were born in the Steppes of Ukraine”!

In my books, I have repeatedly given detailed quotations from Avestan scholars like Gnoli to the effect that Zarathushtra lived in (and was probably “born” in) Southern Afghanistan.

I am a bit tired of people making up stories and attributing views and conclusions to me which I have not only never expressed or made but about which my actual views and conclusions recorded in writing in my books and articles are completely different from those that these people falsely or ignorantly attribute to me. For the objective reader, I can only repeat what I have already said many times: “Please do not accept that I have written something just because someone claims I have done so. Please refer to my actual books and articles to see what I have actually written”.

For a last laugh, apparently an illiterate internet clown (after consulting his mummy and daddy or their google equivalents whose views are the gospel truth for him) has replied to this as follows:

https://x.com/reticentdelhite

https://x.com/reticentdelhite/status/1981584752370200974

Just googled him. The source isn't a historian.

10:23 AM · Oct 24 2025

 


Friday, 17 October 2025

A Funny, if possibly Useful, Advertisement on Twitter (X)

 


A Funny, if possibly Useful, Advertisement on Twitter (X)

Shrikant G. Talageri

 

Someone just sent me the URL of an interesting advertisement of a vegetable-cutting machine uploaded as a tweet on “X”, which has garnered more than a million views:

https://x.com/CProductz/status/1975808230489227460

The product seems interesting. But what caught my attention was that for a few seconds, I thought it was Dhruv Rathee, not earning enough money (or as much money as he wants) on the products that he sells through his youtube channel, now taking up a new job as a salesman for kitchen gadgets.

Sorry: my mistake! I’m becoming old, you know! Such mistakes are bound to happen! And one tends to get easily amused at this age!

 

 

 

 

 

 


Saturday, 11 October 2025

“Grok”s Brazen Lies About the State of the AIT-vs.-OIT Debate

 

“Grok”s Brazen Lies About the State of the AIT-vs.-OIT Debate

Shrikant G. Talageri 

 

Someone sent me the following tweet by the Twitter AI app “Grok:.

Apparently there was the following question put to “Grok”:

https://x.com/__Vyshak__

https://x.com/__Vyshak__/status/1976494435417620576

Give an honest verdict on Talageri's 1993 study And a verdict on Yajnadevams and others who say Indus script from IVC is Sanskrit. Be brutally honest without any filters mercy and sugarcoating.

9:16 AM · Oct 10, 2025

”Grok” immediately (note the time) replies:

Talageri's 1993 "Aryan Invasion Theory: A Reappraisal" argues for Out of India origins of Indo-Aryans via Rigvedic analysis, but mainstream linguistics and genetics (e.g., studies in Cell, Nature) find it methodologically weak, ignoring migration evidence.

9:16 AM · Oct 10, 2025

 

Can there be a more blatant lie than this? After correctly stating “Talageri's 1993 "Aryan Invasion Theory: A Reappraisal" argues for Out of India origins of Indo-Aryans via Rigvedic analysis” (though it misses out on all the linguistic evidence and the archaeological analysis given by me then and ever since, and my refutation of the “genetic” case), “Grok” brazenly lies when it says: “but mainstream linguistics and genetics (e.g., studies in Cell, Nature) find it methodologically weak, ignoring migration evidence.

Do the referred “studies in Cell, Nature” even take note of my textual (let alone linguistic or archaeological) case for the OIT (or my refutation of the “genetics case”), or even mention my name? How the bloody hell then does “Grok’ brazenly state that these, or other similar “mainstream linguistics and genetics” studies, find my case “methodologically weak, ignoring migration evidence”? Clearly, these AI apps are brazenly fraudulent vehicles for western vested-interests to spread organized disinformation.

 

On the other hand, I have dealt in detail with these “mainstream linguistics and genetics” arguments point-by-point and in painstaking detail in my books and articles, and completely demolished them, about which “Grok” feigns complete ignorance. Just some example from my articles:

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-full-out-of-india-case-in-short.html

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-complete-linguistic-case-for-out-of.html

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2025/01/witzel-and-ait-vs-oit-linguistic-debate.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2022/01/ait-vs-oit-chapter-8-archaeological-case.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2023/04/chapter-7-does-genetic-evidence-prove.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2023/08/the-new-paper-by-heggarty-et-al-on.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-battle-of-two-peer-reviewed.html

 

I know positively now that India, in a hundred years, will be an Islamic state with a sizable Christian minority and a slightly smaller Hindu minority (consisting of different caste groups fighting it out amongst themselves). But unless all my above articles are completely wiped out from all records and memory with Orwellian “1984”-like efficiency, the OIT will still prevail. Who knows: maybe Islamic India will be proud of being the Original Homeland of the IE languages (most of Indo-European Europe also having become Islamic by then)After all, Pakistan does claim a history of 5000 years from the Harappan Civilization onwards: and the “Aryan” question is purely one of Language, not of Religion, Philosophy, Cosmology or Race! 


Wednesday, 8 October 2025

Liberalism and Tolerance? An Example of Deep Hindu Hatred

 

Liberalism and Tolerance? An Example of Pathological Hindu Hatred

Shrikant G. Talageri 

 

Someone sent me the following tweet, showing a group of picnicking youngsters sitting under a waterfall with their feet placed on the head of a mūrtī:

https://x.com/VigilntHindutva/status/1975832079494758505

Women placing their feet on the goddess’s statue, utter disrespect. Guess what, They all are hindus.

1:24 PM · Oct 8, 2025

 

Yes, this type of total indifference and disrespect towards Hindu sentiments and Hindu religious objects is becoming more and more common among Hindus, especially among sections of the younger generation, fondly referred to as “Gen Z”.

But leftist/liberal hatred for Hinduism is more active and vicious than this indifference and disrespect of youth. One person has given the following comment in reply to this tweet and video:

https://x.com/VikramGames

https://x.com/VikramGames/status/1975894056464154778

Where else should they put their feet? Pair kaat ke aayein kya? Why are you so sensitive about these silly things?

5:30 PM · Oct 8, 2025

One person replied to this comment as follows:

https://x.com/mom2910200/status/1975982647726964988

U see it as a silly thing are u really a indian when they know the goddess has been placed they should have waterfall elsewhere why to keep feet on goddess head

11:22 PM · Oct 8, 2025

The liberal Hindu-hater replies as follows:

How does it matter? There are thousands of other important things we should be concerned about, not religion or faith.

1:19 AM · Oct 9, 2025

 

And “guess what”, this Hindu-hater, who thinks no-one should feel such matters (as disrespect to a mūrtī) important enough to comment on,  himself finds the tweet (by the Hindu concerned about disrespect to a mūrtī) much more important than the “thousands of other important things we should be concerned about”: he takes the trouble of commenting on it and then continuing to argue about it, leaving aside his concern about all the “thousands of other important things we should be concerned about”. Apparently disrespect to a Hindu mūrtī does not “matter” at all, but a Hindu objecting to it “matters” very much, and requires him to don his battle gear to combat that Hindu!

 

Two thoughts came to my mind from this exchange:

1. Would this Hindu-hater also have taken the trouble to remind any person objecting to someone sitting with their feet on the religious book of Islam or Christianity, about the “thousands of other important things we should be concerned about”?

2. And, incredibly, this “liberal” person, on the personal level, is nothing less than a beggar. His Twitter i.d. begs for money from those who view his tweets: “Disabled gamer trying to make a living on X. Please support me @ paypal.me….”. Apparently, giving him financial help is one, and perhaps the most important one, of the “thousands of other important things we should be concerned about”!

This Hindu-hater, like all woke “liberal” people, has a very high hyper-inflated opinion of his own opinions, since his twitter i.d. goes on to claim that his tweets are “all for the greater good with everyone standing to benefit incrementally from my posts”!! With, of course, himself standing to benefit incrementally from all the money sent to him by other Hindu-hating “liberals” pleased with his venom!

He is not alone. Hindu society is full of millions of such people.

 

  


Wednesday, 1 October 2025

Israel, Palestinians and India: Some Thoughts to Ponder

 

Israel, Palestinians and India: Some Thoughts to Ponder

Shrikant G. Talageri 

 

It has become mandatory for all countries and peoples of the world, and all leftist Hindus, to shed crocodile tears over the “plight” of Palestinians. Eerily, increasing numbers of non-leftist Hindus (including even Hindus who are avowedly “Hindutva”-minded) also shed crocodile-tears for Palestinians and talk of the rights of Palestinians, in line with the guidelines of woke-dictated political-“correctness”-dogma. And the strange part of it is that these Hindus, without exhibiting even the slightest blush of shame, quote the woke spokespersons of the west as authorities on the Israel-Palestine issue spokespersons who have never seen fit to comment on the ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan or Bangladesh, but who allege instead that Muslims are being targeted in India!

Hinduism is the native religion of India, and Islam the religion which was brought in and spread by the sword by invaders in circumstances (involving large scale massacres of millions of Hindus. destruction of lakhs of Hindu temples, and transportation of millions of Hindus to Islamic West Asia as slaves) recorded in pitiless detail by the Islamic invaders themselves. In 1947, India was divided, ostensibly between Hindus and Muslins, and Muslims were given an Islamic state (now broken up into two separate militant Islamic states where Hindus, when allowed to live, face massive discrimination and repression, and shrinking numbers) while Hindus were given a Hindu+Muslim+Christian state where every law and official/legal procedure is loaded against Hindus and favorable to the Muslim-Christian “minorities” (whose numbers are continuously on the rise).

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2023/09/a-short-review-of-anand-ranganathans.html

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2023/04/dismantling-global-hindutva.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2023/09/is-indias-importance-in-world-on-rise.html 

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2022/10/why-is-hindutvavadi-bjp-more.html

 

And yet, the leftists and their sepoy echo-chambers (including many so-called “Hindutva-minded Hindus”) keep chanting the “Palestinians are oppressed” chant in ever increasingly loud and strident tones. The “Hindutva-minded Hindus” among them, of course, avoid stretching the rhetoric to cover “Muslims are oppressed in India”, but otherwise their voices chime in with those of the Breaking India Forces when it comes to Israel!

[The main psychology behind the anti-Israel, or ostensibly Palestinian-sympathetic attitude of these above “Hindutva-minded Hindus” is that age old one of scapegoats not liking to see other scapegoats getting out of the rut, or refusing to wallow in the rut as Hindus are doing: i.e. they resent the Israelis’ (or Zionist Jews’) refusal to submit passively to victimhood while at the same time having their tormentors branded as victims, as they (Hindus) themselves have always been doing.

There is a very misogynistic saying in Kannada that if a newly married bride (in the evil old days of shaven-headed widows) were to go to a widow for blessings, the (perhaps unspoken) blessing would be “nanna hāgē āgu magaḷē”: “become just like me, my child”. These particular "Hindutva-minded Hindus" would want the Zionist Jews of Israel to become just like the self-destructive, defeatist, suicide-minded Hindus, and to head passively and submissively towards their doom. That they refuse to do so, and strive to survive against the “Breaking Israel Forces”, makes these Hindus seethe inwardly, though most of them would refuse to recognize this].

The refrain of the world at the moment is: Palestinians are oppressed in Israel and Muslims are oppressed in India.           

Let us examine some of the facts in this case:

1. Do the figures of Muslim refugees in (for example) Europe, show that Palestinians are oppressed in Israel and Muslims are oppressed in India?

2. Do the population figures in India and Israel show that Palestinians are oppressed in Israel and Muslims are oppressed in India?

3. Who is oppressed and Where?

The questions below are mine, and the answers are by Google AI overview:

 

I. Do the figures of Muslim refugees in (for example) Europe, show that Palestinians are oppressed in Israel and Muslims are oppressed in India?

“Muslim Refugees in Europe by country of origin”:

Google AI overview: “Muslim refugees in Europe primarily come from Syria and Afghanistan, with significant numbers also originating from Iraq, Somalia, and various African countries like Egypt, Algeria, and Morocco. While Syrians were the largest group of unaccompanied minors seeking asylum in the EU in early 2024, other nationalities like Afghans, Egyptians, and Somalis were also prominent. Recent data shows that Germany hosts the largest number of refugees in Europe, with Syrians being the largest refugee group there at the end of 2022

“How many Muslim refugees in Europe are from Israel?”

Google AI overview: “There are no available statistics for the number of "Muslim refugees in Europe from Israel" specifically because the term "refugee" typically refers to those fleeing persecution or conflict in their country of origin, and the vast majority of Muslim migrants from the Palestinian territories or other Arab nations have not originated from Israel. However, there are millions of Palestinian refugees, many of them Muslim, who have been displaced from their homes in the areas of historic Palestine…. In summary, there are no distinct statistics for "Muslim refugees from Israel" because the concept of "refugee" does not apply to the population of Israel itself. Instead, the relevant population would be the displacement and diaspora of the Palestinian people, a significant portion of whom are Muslim and have sought refuge in Europe and other countries.

“How many Muslim refugees in Europe are from India?”

Google AI overview: “Several other countries, however, were the origin of more overall migrants to Europe. India, for example, was the second-biggest source of migrants to Europe (480,000) between mid-2010 and mid-2016; very few of these migrants came as refugees, and only an estimated 15% were Muslims.

“How many Muslim refugees in Europe?”

Google AI overview: “There are not readily available precise, up-to-date figures for the total number of Muslim refugees in Europe, as data on religious affiliation among asylum seekers and refugees is complex and not consistently collected across countries. However, between mid-2014 and mid-2016, an estimated 980,000 Muslim refugees arrived in Europe, and by mid-2016, the Pew Research Center estimated that a total of 1.3 million Muslims had received, or were expected to receive, refugee status in Europe

This is from 1914-1916 alone, and does not include immigrants who were not “refugees”.

 

II. Do the population figures in India and Israel show that Palestinians are oppressed in Israel and Muslims are oppressed in India?

“Percentage of Muslim citizens in Israel”

Google AI overview: “The Muslim population in Israel constitutes approximately 18% of the total population, numbering over 1.7 million people as of recent data from 2023-2024. Muslims are the largest religious minority in the country and include a significant portion of the population of Arab origin, who are citizens of Israel.

[The Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank are not officially Israeli citizens like the 1.7 million Palestinians within the rest of Israel who are Israeli citizens. They are stateless. But unlike the millions of Muslims from Muslim countries who are spreading all over the world as persecuted refugees fleeing from oppression and persecution, neither the Palestinians citizens within Israel nor those within Gaza and the West Bank seem inclined to flee from “oppression and persecution”].


“Percentage of Hindus in Bangladesh in various censuses from 1951”

Google AI overview: “The Hindu population percentage in Bangladesh has shown a continuous decline since 1951. According to census data, the percentage was 22.0% in 1951, decreased to 18.5% in 1961, and further fell to 8.5% by the 2011 census. The overall trend shows a reduction from 22% in 1951 to approximately 8.5-8.9% in recent years.

Population of Bangladesh: 17.36 crores

See the following scene in Bangladesh:

https://x.com/HinduVoice_in/status/1965688287131304129

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2024/08/indian-citizenship-for-bangladeshi.html

 

“Percentage of Muslims in India in various censuses from 1951”

Google AI overview: “The Muslim population in India has remained stable, increasing modestly from 9.8% in 1951 to 14.2% in 2011, according to the Pew Research Center. This reflects a broader trend where the share of Hindus in the population has slightly decreased while the share of Muslims has increased over the same period.

But note: “increasing modestly”:

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-revolutionary-new-mathematics.html

 

III. Who is oppressed and Where?

GenocideWatch on “genocide” of Muslims in India and Israel:

https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-watch-expert-warns-of-genocide-of-muslims-in-india 

https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-emergency-gaza-and-the-west-bank-2024

 

But on genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh, GenocideWatch says nothing about it, only talks about 1971 in religion-neutral terms:

https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/recognition-of-the-bangladesh-genocide-of-1971

 

And GenocideWatch on Kashmir:

Google AI overview: “Genocide Watch first issued a "Genocide Alert" for Indian-administered Kashmir in August 2019, following India's revocation of Article 370, which removed the region's special autonomous status. In a December 2020 "Genocide Warning" for India, the organization reiterated its concerns about the situation in Kashmir and nationwide anti-Muslim violence.

Note; Kashmiri Hindus the over five lakhs who were forced to flee from Kashmir, never to be allowed to return  never even ever existed and therefore cannot possibly have ever been oppressed in any way, which is why they never figured in any descriptions of the situation in Kashmir at any point of time in the past or present or future, especially in the eyes of woke tools like GenocideWatch!!

 

And predictably, what is the “Hindutva” Indian government’s attitude towards the “Palestinians”?

Indian BJP government’s aid to Palestinians:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indian-aid-for-palestine-close-to-record-80m-in-last-11-years-govt/articleshow/124222832.cms#:~:text=India%20has%20continued%20to%20extend,the%20agency%20since%202020%2D21.

And “Indian aid to Bangladesh Hindus”:

Google AI overview: “India's "aid" to Hindus in Bangladesh largely consists of diplomatic action and expressions of concern to the Bangladeshi government over targeted violence, rather than direct humanitarian assistance. India has a record of taking a "serious note" of violence against Hindus and has reiterated its concerns to the Bangladeshi government, especially during periods like the 2024 anti-Hindu violence and attacks on temples during the 2024 Durga Puja festival. While there's no specific program of aid for Bangladeshi Hindus, India's approach is through bilateral diplomatic engagement and monitoring the situation via its High Commission in Dhaka.

Note: the word “aid” is put in inverted commas by the Google AI overview itself!

Do all the above facts and figures show that Palestinians are being oppressed in Israel and Muslims in India? Certainly the Muslim citizens of Israel and India seem to have no interest whatsoever in fleeing from Israel and India as refugees to escape their “oppression”.

And even the BJP and its so called “Hindutva” sepoys are not bothered about Hindus in Bangladesh.

 

In sum, let me explain why I wrote this article.

It is not to warn Hindus. Hindus are a people with a death-wish, and they will never wake up. India will be a Muslim state (with a large Christian minority and a slightly smaller Hindu one) within fifty years, or a century at the most. Thank God I will not be there to see it!

It is to warn Jews. Not the woke Jews or the Ultra-orthodox religious Jews, but the Jews who really care about the future of Jews: Do not take Hindus as your model!

[Ambedkar had tried to warn Hindus before 1947 and had urged the partition of India with a peaceful exchange of populations so that the Hindu-Muslim conflict within India would end forever. No-one listened to him: neither the Muslims, nor the British, nor the Congress, nor the Leftists, nor the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha!]

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2021/10/karna-and-yudhisthira-in-mahabharata.html

If you want to survive, or at least increase the probability of survival (in an increasingly anti-Jewish world), don’t care two figs for who says what about you: remain Jews and do not become suicide-prone imitation-Hindus. Do not depend on support from “Hindutvite” politicians and their bhakts: they do not bother to support Hindus, why will they bother to support Jews? You are on your own, so do not strive for good-conduct certificates from your enemies who want to destroy you. Do whatever you have to do to survive with a homeland “where the (your) mind is without fear, and the head held high” (as Tagore put it).

 


Sunday, 14 September 2025

Yajñopavīta: A Test Case for Text-book Etymologists

 


Yajñopavīta: A Test Case for Text-book Etymologists

Shrikant G Talageri

 

This is not a long article: it is only about a question on which I have ruminated for long, and which has continuously haunted me. I now realized that it is also a question which should be answered by etymologists and linguists (and their countless sepoys on the internet) who wax eloquent on exact phonetic rules of derivation when discussing the origins of words, and argue against certain words being Indo-European or Indo-Aryan simply because, as per their textbook dogmas, these words do not follow the rules of phonetic derivation which they believe to be immutable laws of nature.

Of course, they always completely forget these immutable laws when convenient to them! I have pointed this out countless times in my articles. Most especially in the following one:

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2022/08/indian-fauna-elephants-foxes-and-ait.html 

The above is not a single instance. All opponents of the OIT follow this kind of selective faith in immutable phonetic laws when they do not want to accept clear connections between PIE roots and certain Indo-Aryan words which they want to brand as “non-Aryan” (non-Indo-European) and ignore these laws when inconvenient to their anti-OIT arguments. And I have had occasion to refer to these fraudulent arguments countless times in my articles.

 

No, I am not going to go into old cases repeatedly discussed. I only wish to place this one single test before whoever chooses to think about it, and not merely in continuation of arguing it out but because I am genuinely interested in knowing the answer:

The word for the “sacred thread” in Sanskrit is “yajñopavīta”. The words in some other prominent modern Indo-Aryan languages are:

Hindi:   janeū.

Marathi:   zānve.

Gujarati:   janoī.

Sindhi:   jānyā.

 

Even the Dravidian languages have some related words:

Kannada:   janivāra.

Telugu:   jandhyam(u).

 

What exactly are the exact immutable rules (different for each language) of phonetic change which transform the Sanskrit yajñopavīta to janeū in Hindi, zānve in Marathi, janoī in Gujarati, and jānyā in Sindhi? I will not ask the same question for the Kannada and Telugu words since of course they cannot be claimed to be genetically derived from the Sanskrit word and can only be adopted from Sanskrit.

That the four words are derived from the Sanskrit word is undeniable and is not being denied. The question is: are there really immutable phonetic laws of sound change which govern these derivations. What are those laws in each case? And are they regular laws: i.e. do they apply in every case where the Sanskrit sound becomes a Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati or Sindhi word? Are the Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati and Sindhi words for yajña then jan, zān, jan and jān respectively?. And how (i.e. on the basis of which exact and immutable phonetic rules) does upavīta get converted every time to , ve, , and respectively?

 

If even words, about whose derivation there can be no doubt, fail to follow immutable rules, how can allegedly immutable rules of phonetic derivation be used as clinching arguments, as people always do when discussing IE issues?

I do not want to indulge in arguments and discussions on this. I am merely musing about it. Idly.   

 

APPENDIX dated 19 September 2025:

I received a reply to my above query:

Sanskrit yajñopavīta became Prakrit jaṇṇovavīya or jaṇṇovavīa (attested in Maharashtri Prakrit). The sound change /jñ/ > /ṇṇ/ and p > v are pretty well established Sanskrit > Prakrit sound changes, so I will not dwell into them. 

Regarding Konkani zānvễ and Marathi j̈ānve both of them descending from the Maharashtri Prakrit jaṇṇovavī(y)a, the sound combination jaṇṇ undergoes compensatory lengthening, thereby j̈aṇṇ > j̈āṇ > j̈ān. The de-retroflexion is an internal phenomenon in Marathi, as Old Marathi had jāṇīveṃ, with the retroflex /ṇ/. This is a case of metathesis, where jaṇṇovavīa becomes j̈āṇovavī(y)a > j̈āṇīvavoya/j̈āṇīvovaya (metathesis of vowels in alternate forms is expected, for example see Kannada janavira/janivara) > j̈āṇīve (dropping /o/). zānve seems to have had a similar derivation (with regards to the compensatory lengthening & metathesis), but I am not able to find the Old Konkani form (please pardon me, I'm not a Konkanist). 

As for Gujarati janoī it is most likely derived from the Prakrit form jaṇṇovīa, an alternate form of jaṇṇovavīya, which is attested in Brahmi. jaṇṇovīa > jano-īa (leading to a temporary glottal stop or hiatus in between) > janoi is an obvious derivation. 

Sindhi janya is pretty easy, it's a shortening and de-retroflexion of the Sauraseni Prakrit word jaṇṇovavīya. It is a northwestern Indo-Aryan language. 

Hindi janeu is interesting which involves a metathesis across syllables, basically jaṇṇovavīya > jaṇṇavavīyo. Due to the stress on the long vowel + semi-vowel, change from īyo > eu is an expected sound change, and is not very surprising. So jaṇṇavavīyo > janeu (the intermediate syllables dropped as shortening) is not a surprising sound change.

As for Kannada janivāra, it is from Old Kannada ಜನ್ನವಿರ (jannavira). It likely underwent compensatory lengthening jānavira & later metathesis to janivāra as secondary developments in Kannada itself. This is an irregular development from jaṇṇovavīya, I admit, but is considered due to the influence of the term janna-dāra (ಜನ್ನದಾರ).

We must also note that jaṇṇa was the Prakrit term for yajña. However, since it went out of use during the Middle Indo-Aryan period, it was not inherited in new Indo-Aryan languages & the Sanskrit word yajña became more popular in colloquial use. However, since jaṇṇovavīya and other Prakrit terms were still in use, it was inherited in new Indo-Aryan languages undergoing their respective strange sound changes from that particular part of the compound word. It must also be noted that the New Indo-Aryan descendant words of jaṇṇovavīya when broken into compounds, do not actually make sense as they're all inherited from a Prakrit word. 

It is also interesting that Sanskrit upavīta > Maharashtri Prakrit uvavīa > Marathi ovī cannot be obtained from j̈ānve suggesting a very old derivation from Prakrit itself.

 

My reply to this:

Thank you for this reply. It brought many interesting intermediate forms to my notice. but providing different combinations of different phonetic laws to explain every different derivation (while attributing unexplainable changes to unrecorded medial forms) is not the answer to my "challenge". You will note that I asked the following question in sum: "That the four words are derived from the Sanskrit word is undeniable and is not being denied. The question is: are there really immutable phonetic laws of sound change which govern these derivations. What are those laws in each case? And are they regular laws: i.e. do they apply in every case where the Sanskrit sound becomes a Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati or Sindhi word? Are the Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati and Sindhi words for yajña then jan, zān, jan and jān respectively?. And how (i.e. on the basis of which exact and immutable phonetic rules) does pavīta get converted every time to eū, ve, oī, and yā respectively?".

The whole explanation is in the same way that the derivations of the words for fox are explained and accepted while derivations of the words for elephant from "rbha" are rejected as not phonetically or phonologically valid as per immutable laws. To take just one question, has every single Sanskrit "y" without exception become "j/z" in every single Indo-aryan language by an immutable law? Then how would you explain all those words where "y" remains "y" or "j" becomes "y"? The point is not how, with different twisted and multiple explanations (and assumed missing intermediate forms) you can show derivations. The point is: how can you categorically reject obvious derivations by claiming they do not fit in with immutable phonetic laws.

 

And this is the basic inconsistency inherent in anti-OIT arguments: their rejections of particular IE or IA derivations is not based on logic or facts but on dogmas. Dogmas which can be completely relaxed or ignored/bypassed when you want to accept some unexplainable derivation, but which can be raised as immutable laws when you want to reject some even very obvious derivation by saying it does not exactly fit in with the immutable law.

This is how a textbook etymologist par excellence rejected the derivation of four IE words for “elephant” even when the derivation is undeniable (Vedic ibha, Latin ebur, Greek erepa/elepha, Hittite laḫpa) from *ṛbha/*ḷbha like the related word ṛbhu- which, as per Macdonell, comes "from the root rabh, to grasp, thus means 'handy', 'dexterous'" (MACDONELL 1897:133), while giving convoluted, hypothetical and faith-appealing explanations (or rather pleas) to show how the different words for “fox” in different IE languages can still be claimed, on faith, or on the speculations of IE scholars, to be ultimately (even if unexplainably) derived from PIE:

https://talageri.blogspot.com/2022/08/indian-fauna-elephants-foxes-and-ait.html 

Even so-called “AI apps”, when they cannot explain something, just weakly point to “academic consensus” to justify ignoring or rejecting facts and data placed before them.