VI. The North-East
Finally, we come to the last region of India, the
North East, consisting of Assam and the six small states of Manipur, Nagaland,
Mizoram, Meghalaya, Tripura and Arunachal Pradesh. This is the most vulnerable
part of India, connected to the rest of India only by a small strip of land in
northern West Bengal to the north of Bangladesh, open to endless infiltration
from Bangladesh, most vulnerable to the Chinese menace (China is already in
occupation of a major chunk of Arunachal Pradesh), and the happiest hunting
grounds in India for Christian conversion activity since the days of the
British Raj – in fact more so since the
British left, as the following statistics from the post-Independence Indian
census for the percentage of the Christian population in at least five of the
north eastern states shows:
STATE
|
1951
|
1961
|
1971
|
1981
|
2001
|
Manipur
|
11.84
|
19.49
|
26.03
|
29.68
|
34.04
|
Nagaland
|
46.05
|
52.98
|
66.76
|
80.21
|
89.96
|
Mizoram
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
83.81
|
86.97
|
Meghalaya
|
–
|
35.21
|
46.98
|
52.62
|
70.25
|
Arunachal Pr
|
–
|
–
|
0.79
|
4.32
|
18.72
|
[Earlier figures are not available for some of the
states since the states came into existence after those dates]
The rise has been most phenomenal in Arunachal
Pradesh, where the Christian percentage has grown from 0.79% in 1971 to 18.72%
in 2001: this does not include the figures for crypto-Christians who are many
in number in this state due to strong opposition from local tribals opposed to
this massive proselytization. And in the only state, of these five, which
consistently had a Hindu majority (of around 60%) from 1951 to 1981, Manipur,
the Hindu percentage in 2001 was suddenly down to 46.01%. The census figures
for 2011 are still not available, and there is no doubt that the percentage of
Christians in all these states must have increased even more sharply in 2011,
with Manipur rapidly hurtling towards becoming a Hindu-micro-minority state
like the other four.
But coming to the tribal population in these states,
the following is the percentage of tribals in the total population of each of
these states (2001):
STATE
|
Total Population
|
Tribal Population
|
%age of Tribals in Total Population
|
Assam
|
266,55,968
|
33,08,570
|
12.4
|
Tripura
|
31,99,203
|
9,93,426
|
31.1
|
Meghalaya
|
23,18,822
|
19,92,862
|
85.9
|
Manipur
|
21,66,788
|
7,41,141
|
34.2
|
Nagaland
|
19,90,036
|
17,74,026
|
89.1
|
Arunachal Pr
|
10,97,968
|
7,05,158
|
64.2
|
Mizoram
|
8,88,573
|
8,39,310
|
94.5
|
Within the tribal population of each state, the following is the distribution
of population by religion:
STATE
|
%age of Hindus
|
%age of Buddhists
|
%age of Christians
|
%age of Others
|
Total of H+B+C+O
|
Assam
|
90.7
|
0.2
|
8.8
|
0.1
|
99.8
|
Tripura
|
80.1
|
9.6
|
10.0
|
–
|
99.7
|
Meghalaya
|
5.9
|
0.1
|
79.8
|
13.2
|
99.0
|
Manipur
|
1.0
|
96.8
|
1.6
|
99.4
|
|
Nagaland
|
–
|
–
|
98.5
|
–
|
98.5
|
Arunachal
|
13.1
|
11.7
|
26.5
|
47.2
|
98.5
|
Mizoram
|
–
|
8.3
|
90.5
|
–
|
98.8
|
It can be seen that there is a
complete sweep of conversion to Christianity among the tribal populations of
Manipur, Nagaland and Mizoram: 96.8%, 98.5% and 90.5% respectively (the Chakma
tribe of Mizoram alone representing a Buddhist survival of 8.3% in that state).
In Meghalaya, in spite of an
otherwise similar sweep (79.8% of the tribals), there is a residual survival of
the original tribal religions among minor sections of the two main tribes in
the state:
TRIBE
|
%age of Hindus
|
%age of Buddhists
|
%age of Christians
|
%age of Others
|
Total of H+B+C+O
|
Khasi
|
1.11
|
0.12
|
80.74
|
17.91
|
99.88
|
Garo
|
0.73
|
0.06
|
91.49
|
7.67
|
99.95
|
In Arunachal Pradesh, there is an
even bigger survival of the original tribal religion: Here we have the
traditional Donyi Polo religion followed by almost 47.2% of the tribal
population of the state, or 30.3% of the total population of the state.
In Manipur, as we saw, there is a
clean sweep of conversion to Christianity as in the case of Nagaland and
Mizoram, with 96.8% of the tribals converted to Christianity. But, unlike
Nagaland and Mizoram, where almost the entire populations are classified as
tribal (89.1 and 94.5 respectively, the rest of the state population including
emigrants from other neighbouring states and the rest of India), in Manipur
only 34.2% of the population is classified as tribal: the major ethnic group in
the state, the Meitei, constituting 51.04% of the population, is not counted as
tribal. But it is among a section of the Meitei that we see a surviving tribal
religion:
TRIBE?
|
%age of Hindus
|
%age of Buddhists
|
%age of Christians
|
%age of Others
|
Total of H+B+C+O
|
Meitei
|
79.74
|
–
|
0.25
|
20.01
|
100.0
|
There are other miniscule populations among the tribes
of these five states of the North East still practicing their ancestral
religious or belief systems, but they have been reduced to a micro-minority by
the time of the 2001 census itself, and may by now be almost completely
decimated.
In the two most populated states of the North East,
Assam and Tripura, a majority of the tribals still count themselves as Hindu
Category One: 90.7% and 80.1% respectively. Note that the percentage of Hindus
in the total population of the two states is 64.89% and 85.63% respectively. In
Assam at least, we see the phenomenon of a tribal population which is more
emphatically Hindu than the general non-tribal population of the state.
In Assam (and Tripura), we find Christian converts
mainly among the spill over of tribals from neighbouring states, like the Garo
(Meghalaya), Khasi (Meghalaya), Hmar (Manipur), and various Naga (Nagaland),
Mizo (Mizoram), and Kuki (Manipur) tribes. But, Hindu Category Three tribals
are largely absent in Assam and Tripura.
As to the rest of the tribes of Assam and Tripura, the
following is the distribution of population by religion:
TRIBE
|
States
|
Total Population
|
%age of Hindus
|
%age of Buddhists
|
%age of Christians
|
Total of H+B+C
|
Bodo
|
A
|
14,76,370
|
90.12
|
0.07
|
9.71
|
99.90
|
Tippera
|
T
|
6,21,109
|
94.65
|
0.19
|
4.91
|
99.75
|
Karbi/Arleng
|
A
|
6,00,111
|
87.14
|
–
|
11.61
|
98.75
|
Miri
|
A
|
5,89,219
|
99.08
|
–
|
0.43
|
99.51
|
KachariSonwal
|
A
|
3,93,397
|
98.81
|
0.06
|
0.76
|
99.63
|
Lalung/Tiwa
|
A
|
3,09,000
|
98.55
|
0.15
|
1.16
|
99.86
|
Rabha
|
A
|
3,03,644
|
93.28
|
–
|
6.69
|
99.97
|
Reang
|
T
|
1,36,894
|
82.68
|
0.08
|
17.21
|
99.97
|
Chakma
|
A, T
|
1,20,176
|
16.06
|
76.41
|
6.92
|
99.39
|
Dimasa
|
A
|
90,006
|
98.18
|
0.24
|
0.89
|
99.31
|
Jamatia
|
T
|
82,370
|
92.49
|
0.29
|
7.18
|
99.96
|
Deori
|
A
|
54,230
|
99.62
|
–
|
0.24
|
99.86
|
Halam
|
T
|
50,984
|
65.01
|
0.05
|
34.82
|
99.88
|
Barman
|
A
|
25,569
|
93.51
|
–
|
6.30
|
99.81
|
Tripura Munda
|
T
|
15.469
|
93.54
|
–
|
6.20
|
99.74
|
Mech
|
A
|
11,788
|
98.97
|
0.16
|
0.81
|
99.94
|
Tripura Orang
|
T
|
8.622
|
96.06
|
0.12
|
3.75
|
99.93
|
Hojai
|
A
|
6.624
|
94.37
|
1.15
|
3.91
|
99.43
|
Even more interesting is the fact that certain
important and well-known tribes of mainland India are native to Assam as well
in large numbers, but they are not counted among the scheduled tribes in Assam.
The following are their population figures by distribution of religion:
TRIBE
|
States
|
Total Population
|
%age of Hindus
|
%age of Christians
|
%age of Others
|
Total of H+B+C
|
Munda
|
A
|
13,80,226
|
93.99
|
5.96
|
0.04
|
99.99
|
Santal
|
A
|
10,06,397
|
90.88
|
6.72
|
2.40
|
100.00
|
Oraon
|
A
|
6,47,904
|
94.05
|
5.84
|
0.11
|
100.00
|
Gond
|
A
|
5,90,953
|
94.75
|
5.03
|
0.13
|
99.91
|
Bhumij
|
A
|
2,03,901
|
98.02
|
1.88
|
0.02
|
99.92
|
Kharia
|
A
|
1,87,908
|
98.70
|
1.25
|
0.05
|
100.00
|
Kui Khond
|
A
|
58,025
|
95.58
|
4.38
|
0.04
|
100.00
|
Korwa
|
A
|
43,087
|
99.17
|
0.83
|
0.00
|
100.00
|
Korku
|
A
|
38,492
|
97.78
|
2.18
|
0.00
|
99.96
|
Ho
|
A
|
37,034
|
95.46
|
4.48
|
0.06
|
100.00
|
The overwhelming majority of them
are clearly Hindu, with only a small percentage (2.40%) of the Santals (24,122
out of 10,06,397 Santals) declaring themselves as “Others” or Hindu Category
Three.
Therefore, even Assam is not an
exception to the all India phenomenon: the overwhelming majority of the tribals
are self-declared Hindu Category One, even more completely and
emphatically than the non-tribal population.
To sum up, the tribal population
of India is even more (if we may use such a term) “purely” Hindu than the
non-tribal population. The tribals are Hindu Category One everywhere,
except in a few cases. And all of these few cases of Hindu Category Three,
except the biggest one of them all, are found in the forest and hill areas of
the north-east. The only one further west, the biggest of the Hindu Category
Three religions, Sarna, is centred in the forests of Jharkhand.
STATE
|
Hindu Category Three Religion
|
No. of Followers of the Religion
|
Jharkhand ++
|
Sarna
|
60,00,000++
|
Arunachal Pr
|
Donyi Polo
|
3,32,835
|
Meghalaya
|
Khasi
|
2,29,212
|
Manipur
|
Meitei
|
2,21,275
|
Meghalaya
|
Garo
|
59,050
|
The facts are crystal clear: except
for followers of these five religions, all the tribal population of India
(except converts to Christianity) consists overwhelmingly of Hindu Category One
tribals. As the religious population figures of the 2011 Indian Census are
still undisclosed, we do not know what the situation is today (2013) and what
it will be at some point of time in the future. We do not know how far the
efforts to break off the tribals from Hindu society, by converting them to
Christianity or trying to convince them even otherwise that they are not
Hindus, will be successful. But the fact is that as of the data now available,
they are full-fledged Hindus, self-declared, and any change in the
situation can only be a change
brought about by Goebbelsian and diabolical machinations, and can not represent
the original situation.
Yet the billion-dollar funded
political and academic campaign to cut off the tribal population of India from
the non-tribal population by branding the tribals as non-Hindu, often branding
them with innocuous names like “animists”, is in full flow. One example will
suffice:
The Wikipedia entry on the Karbi
(Arleng) tribals of Assam shows a graph titled “Religion among Karbi”, which
tells us that 84.64% of the Karbi follow “Traditional Beliefs”, and 15.00%
follow “Christianity”. We are further told: “Most of the Karbis still practice their traditional belief system,
which is animistic, called ‘Hemphu Mukrong’, However, there are also Karbi
Christians (some 15% , according to the Census of India, 2011). The
practitioners of traditional worship believe in reincarnation and honour the
ancestors”. However, the census figures (for 2001 – how the person posting
this entry claims to have got the religious population figures for 2011, not
yet available anywhere, for this particular tribe, is a mystery) tell us that
87.14% (5,22,954 people) of the Karbi/Arleng of Assam (total population
6,00,111) are Hindu, 11.61% (69,645) are Christian, and 1.23% (7,390) follow
“other” (i.e. non-Hindu-Buddhist-Sikh-Jain and non-Christian-Muslim-Parsi-Jew)
religions. And these figures are faithfully reported in the data provided by
the Joshua Project, whose aim is to give the genuine religious population figures for all the ethnic peoples of
the world, so as to enable missionaries to formulate their strategies
accordingly. The Wikipedia article, like articles in the Indian media or in
books meant for consumption in India, obviously have different aims: the
primary one being the old policy of “Divide and Conquer”.
Hitherto, we have only examined the
basic statistics to show that the Indian tribal population is Hindu, wholly
Hindu, and nothing but Hindu – in fact more Hindu than the non-tribal
population of India. The tribals themselves say so.
We already pointed out that the
three aims of this insidious propaganda is:
a) to tell the tribals that they are not Hindus and
have no connections with the larger Hindu society around them,
b) to tell the world that the converted tribals are
not Hindus in the first place, and so it is no business of the Hindus to
interfere if the tribals are converted to Christianity, and
c) to tell posterity that Hinduism
is as foreign a religion to India as Christianity, in the name of the Aryan
invasion theory, as the tribals follow “pre-Aryan” religions while Hinduism is
an “Aryan” religion brought by “Aryan invaders” from outside.
Now, we have the existing Hindu
Category Three religions (Sarna, Donyi Polo, Khasi, Meitei, Garo, and possibly
others practiced by more microscopic sections of other isolated tribes). We
also have attempts by the missionary machinery to create new Hindu Category
Three religions (in the name of “animism”, etc., as appellations for people who
call themselves Hindu, as we saw in the above example of the Karbi tribe of
Assam) on the principle that it is easier to target and swallow smaller
entities
No comments:
Post a Comment