Tuesday, 13 January 2026

The “Scientist” Clown At It Again

 

The “Scientist” Clown At It Again

Shrikant G. Talageri 

 

I have written articles on GROK and its persistent lies so often that I finally had to stop. Likewise I have written so many times about the persistent lies of the Jijith-Koenraad pair that I had to stop. But perhaps, a finishing touch was required to end that second saga. This finishing touch has been provided today by Jijith (which will no doubt be endorsed soon by Koenraad Elst), actually posted today, 14 January 2026, on the traditionally sacred day of Makara Sankranti as officially celebrated (regardless of whether astronomically today is really Makara Sankranti or not, which is constantly being contested, rightly or wrongly, by both of them) which incredibly demonstrates his stupidity and incorrigible lying nature after being exposed so many times. Is there any such thing as shame and self-respect among such “scientists” and their supporters?

This, apparently is the post this unstable person has posted today (thereby, I admit, also doubtless raising doubts, in the minds of those who are fed up of this issue, whether I am also slightly unstable that I am still taking note of his rantings and ravings. But this is really the absolutely last time I refer to this liar and pseudo-scholar):

https://x.com/Jijith_NR/status/2011226091973984614

You are at the tip of a major discovery! This is because the later edits in Puranas portrayed their final destinations as if they lived forever on Ganga since eternity!

This is how Shrikant Talageri got misled when he used the Puranic data to say Ikshvakus lived on the east from the very beginning.

In Puranas & late Itihāsas we Manu founded Ayodhya city, Divodāsa and Sudas lived in Kashi or Ila in Prayaga and Pururavas near her in Prstistana.

But in Rgveda all of them are correctly located along Sarasvati!

Rgveda is the oldest text Puranas are edited in Sunga-Gupta Periods. Between Rgveda and Itihāsa Purāṇas,Rgveda is correct. It is the Sruti Pramana. It is the oldest text.

Archaeology also agrees.

Settlements on Sarasvati are the oldest. 8000-2000 BCE.

Settlements like Ayodhya, Prayaga and Kashi on Ganga are in contrast dated to 2000-1500 BCE”.

5:27 AM  Jan 14 2026


It is incredible that this lying pair is still trying to propagate that my historical analuysis is based on the Puranas while Jijith, "for the first time ever", has put up a "totally unrefuted" case based on the Rigveda!

No, I am not going to bother to repeat the details about how or why this clown and his supporters are so persistently lying about me and my analysis. His stupid tweet exposes everything. His writings are enough to make all scientists hang their heads in shame.


2 comments:

  1. Namaskaram Talageri ji.

    An individual has done some reconstruction of how apparently the rigvedic hymns sounded when composed. It is quite different from the sakhas which we do pathanam of today ji. Looks very avestan like.

    Can you please take a look 🙏

    https://youtu.be/idqocks32U4?si=YLF_cmGKObmfaTR8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it is up to experts of Vedic chanting to say how right or wrong it is. But it could be that the toning was initially based on the udatta-anudatta-etc. tones alone and then bacame more elaborate and varied with the passage of time: As I said I am not an expert on Vedic chanting.

      But it does not look as if he has affected any changes in the actual words. So on exactly what basis does it look "Avestan like"? The vocabulary of the Avesta is contemporaneous (with the appropriate Avestan sound changes) with the vocabulary of the later parts of the New Rigveda.

      Delete