Are the Social-Media
Regurgitations of AIT-Mongers Based on Slander or Libel, Or Do they Indicate
Hyper-Delusional Disorder?
Shrikant G. Talageri
I just wanted to draw attention to a tweet someone sent to me today. It is apparently put up by a tweeter Pingui@Pingui255111, who has just joined twitter (X) in September 2024, is following 2 and is followed by none, and seems to have joined twitter only as part of an organized slander-campaign.
The tweet, put up yesterday (11-11-2024) is as follows:
“I know, people have done crazier things like talageri who faked a horse image and got caught and embarrassed. There is also a pca sample floating around with 80% steppe dna. That’s why we should wait for published peer reviewed papers and not random tweets or podcast talks.”
The fact that this super-illiterate person thinks “peer-reviewed papers” are Heaven-Dictated Revelations (I have written so much on the third-rate, false and fraudulent nature of peer-reviewed papers, that I will not bother to repeat any of it here) as compared to “random tweets” (excepting of course only his own tweets!) shows the abysmally low intellectual level of not only this specimen but the entire class of AIT-mongers that he represents, goes on to compound his folly by referring to me as “talageri who faked a horse image and got caught and embarrassed”.
Mr. Cartoon, the accusation you make (of faking a horse image and getting caught and embarrassed) was not alleged about me, but about NS Rajaram. Whether it was true or not is not my business to investigate, but the poverty of the AIT side is being perennially demonstrated by its continuous citing of this alleged “fake” to tar the entire anti-AIT side, in the absence of more concrete allegations and in the absence of any defense for countless fakes and frauds from the AIT side. But, alleging that I was the person who is alleged to have faked a horse image is one more step ahead in the fraudulent AIT campaign.
Before this, people have made any number of accusations (not counting of course the half-witted denunciation of scholarship unsupported by “peer-reviews”), such as about my having “insulted Witzel’s wife”, which I have already dealt with in a previous article. What next? Will I be accused of the Gandhi-assassination, on the ground that I am a Hindutva supporter, and will that stand as proof of the untenability of the OIT?
